Machmud Gadjisade

Lawyer

Machmud Gadjisade works as a lawyer at BHO Legal since January 2022 and specializes in public procurement law. Previously, he worked as a lawyer at the law firm Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek in Dusseldorf (practice group: Public Sector and Procurement).

Mr. Gadjisade studied law with a focus on international business law at the University Bonn. Mr. Gadjisade completed his legal traineeship in the district of the Cologne Higher Regional Court with the second state law exam, which he passed with distinction. Part of his legal traineeship were stations at the headquarters of the Federal Foreign Office in Berlin and the administrative court in Cologne.

Education:

  • 2021
    Admission to the bar
  • 2019
    Second State Examination in Law
  • 2017
    First State Examination in Law

Work experience:

  • Derzeit
    Lawyer in the law firm BHO Legal PartG mbB
  • 2021 – 2022
    Lawyer in the law firm Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek
  • 2020 – 2021
    Research fellow in environmental, building and administrative law at Loschel-der Rechtsanwälte, Cologne
  • 2017 – 2019
    Legal trainee at the Head Office of the Federal Foreign Office in Berlin and at the Administrative Court of Cologne, among others

Legal expertise:

Languages:

  • German
  • English
  • Russian
  • French

Publications (selection):

  • ECJ on trade secrets in offers, Article to the decision ECJ, 07.09.2021, C-927/19 (original title: EuGH zu Geschäftsgeheimnissen in Angeboten), Behörden-Spiegel (na-tional newspaper for the public sector in Germany), 2021
  • Retroactive control of train path charges under antitrust law, Article to the decision OLG Dresden, 18.01.2021, U 8/15 Kart (original title: Rückwirkende kartellrechtli-che Kontrolle von Trassenentgelten), Behörden-Spiegel, 2021
  • Duty to give reasons and trade secrets, Article to the decision ECJ, 15.07.2021, C-584/20 P, C-621/20 (original title: Begründungspflicht und Geschäftsgeheimnisse), Behörden-Spiegel, 2021
  • Concession to the best bidder even in case of defective procedure, Article to the de-cision BGH, 09.03.2021, KZR 55/19 (original title: Konzession an Bestbieter selbst bei fehlerhaftem Verfahren), Behörden-Spiegel, 2021
  • GTC-Lump-sum damages in the case of cartel agreements, Article to the decision BGH, 10.02.2021, KZR 63/18 (original title: AGB-Schadenspauschale bei Kartellab-sprachen), Behörden-Spiegel, 2021
  • Extensive documentation in the quality score, Article to the decision OLG München, 26.02.2021, Verg 14/20 (original title: Umfangreiche Dokumentation in der Quali-tätswertung), Behörden-Spiegel, 2021
  • Minimum requirements for main and secondary offer, Article to the decision OLG Düsseldorf, 25.11.2020, Verg 35/19 (original title: Mindestanforderungen an Haupt- und Nebenangebot), Behörden-Spiegel, 2021
  • No reason for exclusion: 0-euro entry for pure sales queries, Article to the decision OLG Dresden, 05.02.2021, Verg 5/20 (original title: Mindestanforderungen an Haupt- und Nebenangebot), Behörden-Spiegel, 2021